In the Iliad, Homer wrote, [1] “The wrath of Achilles is my theme. That fatal wrath, which in the fulfillment of the will of Zeus, sent so many Achaean noblemen to the Hall of Hades leaving their bodies as carrion for the dogs and passing birds...” From this extract it is evident that Achilles was the fundamental character and the greatest warrior in the Iliad. He was seen as the Greek hero of the Trojan War, and has as such been cemented into our universal history as an almost unconquerable fighter whose only weakness was his own Achilles heel - for which he was named. Thus, how does this hero compare to another, such as Herakles?

Achilles and Herakles were both demigods born to fulfill a destiny that was predestined before either of them were born. In the case of Achilles, his mother Thetis had been pursued by both Zeus and Poseidon. However, upon hearing of the prophecy that stated Thetis’ future son was to be greater than his father, they retreated leaving her free to marry the mortal and father of Achilles, Peleus. Once he was born Thetis attempted to make him immortal by bathing him in the river Styx.Yet she missed a spot on his heel and it became his only weakness. 

The river made Achilles near invincible with godlike strength and speed, and it was soon prophesied that Troy could not be taken without his help. Thetis however, was aware that if he went to Troy he would die and so she hid him in Lycomedes disguised as a girl. The ploy worked until Odysseus discovered him and led him willingly to the war that would result in his death.

Herakles’ destiny on the other hand was bound to him by his father Zeus, and his meddling wife Hera.  On the day Herakles was meant to be born Zeus proudly stated that the son of his bloodline through Perseus would rule over Mycenae and all its realm. He had no idea that his vengeful wife would suspend the birth for several days by sitting in the binding position outside of Alcmene’s home, so that another son of his bloodline through Perseus would be seen as the boy in the prophecy. This was unfortunate for Herakles because from that point on he was to forever be in the shadow of his cowardly cousin, once removed, Eurytheus. 

Herakles was incredibly strong and courageous just like Achilles, but unlike Achilles he was not seemingly invincible. Just as Achilles was sent away in his youth so was Herakles who was plagued by murderous rages due to Hera’s hatred for him. These rages led him to murder his music teacher which resulted in him being sent to Amphitryons’ cattle ranch. This would not be the only murder his temper would lead to, as it would ultimately cause the death of his first family resulting in him taking on twelve labors set by Eurytheus as penance. He was told that if he completed all twelve he would be forgiven and granted immortality.

Achilles may have disguised himself as an undefeatable warrior at troy but he captured twenty three towns in Trojan territory before he even got there, thus it is well known that these two heroes were incredible warriors, and this brought them both to situations where they would possibly have to enter into funereal games. Achilles honored his dead friend Patroclus with his own funereal games much like what the Olympics came to be much later when Herakles instituted the first ever games to honor his father Zeus. While Achilles had armor made for him from the Olympians divine blacksmith Hephaestus, Herakles wore the skin of a lion like a cloak wherever he ventured.

Both men eventually married, twice, in Herakles’ case, and they took on lovers too. They share having murdered people that they cared for. For Achilles it was Penthesilea, an Amazon woman whom he murdered during the fight for Troy and after he discovered it was her he felt great remorse. They did share a difference when it came to relationships. Achilles who had only one son would never have as vast a family as Herakles who while living on the cattle ranch impregnated fifty of Amphitryons’ daughters, for the man wanted Herakles’ bloodline in his family. Achilles too impregnated the daughter of the man who took him in as a youth, but the relationship was short lived for he was soon to be discovered and taken to Troy.

The two heroes had many similarities but they were different from each other too. Achilles was seen as respectable because he was a hero of war while Herakles was seen as immoral because of his murderous rages, but they both had tempers, Herakles just could not be trusted to keep his in check. And because war granted you status in ancient Greece the terrible things Achilles did such as the rape of Cassandra in Athenes' temple on her alter played no role in the portrayal of his heroism, while poor Herakles, who was driven mad by Hera, was ill-treated and cheated out of the opportunities he had worked so hard to accomplish because murder, especially that of your own blood was a huge disgrace to the ancient Greeks.

In the end neither of the two proved to be invincible. Achilles was killed in the Trojan War when an arrow shot by Paris and guided by Athene, struck him in his heel. Herakles died a brutal death when his wife was tricked into giving him a cloak covered in the blood of a centaur who was killed by his own arrow that had been dipped in the poisonous blood of the hydra he killed as his second labor. Zeus then guides Herakles to Olympus where he is finally granted immortality, even if it is after death. Interestingly enough it is one of Herakles arrows dipped in hydra blood that kills Paris after he shoots Achilles.

Achilles may not have received immortality like Herakles, but his name has most certainly been immortalized in modern society. Today we call the tendon on our heel the Achilles tendon and it is notorious in sports, mainly with runners because if it were to rupture or develop tendonosis due to overuse an athlete would have to put their career on hold for over a year or retire indefinitely.

Achilles and Herakles were the equivalent of super heroes to the ancient Greeks and because of Achilles heel being his only weakness the modern use of the phrase, ‘Achilles heel,’ is used when we refer to someone having an overwhelming vice or flaw that eventually leads to their destruction or the end of their career. For many famous, ‘idols,’ it is developing an addiction to drugs. For Mike Tyson it was woman, as he was accused of rape on more than one occasion and it practically ruined his career. Our very own South African fallen hero Oscar Pistorius has an Achilles heel too. His penchant for letting off loaded guns in public places with no regard for the law and a fascination with firearms led to his fall from grace when he murdered his model girlfriend, Reeva.

Even modern super heroes from comic books have an Achilles heel. For Iron man it is literally his heart, for Batman it is his parents and for Venom it is fire. Leaving the most similar to Achilles for last there is superman whose Achilles heel is kryptonite. They are both almost invincible, strong and can be blinded by their pride. Neither of them were born with their powers. Superman received his as a child too, but unlike Achilles, his river Styx was the rays of the yellow sun which he absorbed once he came to earth. This of course is not the only case of a hero having ties to Achilles in comics or cartoons. For instance, the anti-hero Obelix in the series of cartoons named Asterix and Obelix, was submerged in a liquid that turned him into a notorious fighter with inhuman strength like that of Achilles. However, he was in no way a demigod and the liquid was a magic potion which he happened to fall into a cauldron of as a child.

Herakles like Achilles was immortalized in a cartoon known as [2]Hercules, but for Herakles Disney deliberately attempted to base the character on the actual hero. However, in the loosely based retelling of the myth Herakles’ enemy was Hades, and his minions, Pain and Panic actually fed him the potion that would make him immortal. He lives with adoptive parents, he does the twelve labors to prove he is a hero, and Pegasus becomes his steed. This is wrong in many ways because Pain and Panic are reminiscent of Ares’ sons, Deimos and Phobos, Hera is Herakles enemy not his mother (and I am sure the demigod would be horrified by this depiction), the twelve labors were for atonement and Pegasus was ridden by Bellerophon. The movie went on to become a cartoon series featuring Hercules during his time at the Prometheus academy.

In 2004 the movie Troy was released with [3]Brad Pitt as Achilles. However the movie and the historical version of his character is vastly different. For instance, in the movie Achilles is portrayed as a nice enough guy, he rescues the princess, he is a great warrior who has been fighting his entire life and one could say it is almost depicted as if he falls in love with Briseis.

This is a complete contradiction to how he is portrayed in the Iliad. In this epic of Homer, Achilles is cruel with a terrible temper. He takes pleasure in seeing the Greeks lose and die and seems to have absolutely no morals. He does not love Briseis, she is nothing more than a war prize to him, but he does become fond enough of her so that when Agamemnon takes her for his own he refuses to fight. That is one example of his temper, another is when Patroclus is killed by Hector and Achilles retaliates by killing Hector and choosing to drag his body behind his chariot instead of allowing it to have funeral rights. He only relents when Priam, Hectors father pleads to Achilles for his son’s body back.

Therefore, Achilles and Herakles have many similarities including a heroic destiny that ends in their tragic deaths, but they are different to each other too, in the way that they are portrayed and the way they have chosen to live their lives. Neither of them has escaped without misfortune and yet in the end we still remember their names and continue to because of the influence of their legends and mythology.





[1]Homer (800BC:1)
[2] Ron Clements (1997)
[3]Wolfgang Petersen (2004)

OLYMPUS is the new Hollywood and the world just can’t get enough! Once again the highest mountain in Greece, fabulous home of the divine family and co. is overflowing with speculation! Move over Kardashians ‘cause this household needs its own reality series!

    We here at the Olympus Observer long for Apollo’s sunny disposition to return. The bronzed god has been cocooned in the Olympus Records studio, reportedly working on a new album after Hestia refused his marriage proposal. Let’s just hope he doesn’t do a Taylor Swift on us and leaves revenge out of the music, and up to the furies!

    And that isn’t the only rumour buzzing throughout the mountain. There is yet more gossip that the self-sufficient goddesses, Artemis and Athene, secretly like woman. We have to say if it is true does it really matter? These virgins have class, which is more than we can say about their relatives.

    In other news, that messy divorce between Aphrodite and Hephaistos is finally over. The polls are up and the question is who will she date next? After the video of their affair leaked for all of Olympus to see we doubt she and Ares are going to make things official, especially not with him still hiding out in Thrace. Word on the street is that Poseidon has it bad for Aphrodite and we have to wonder, does his wife not notice that her husband is just as bad at staying faithful as her ‘all powerful’ brother in law? Or does she just not care?

    Speaking of Zeus, we really do admire the queen of vendettas –Hera. Her devotion to her husband is out of this world, but we have to ask, why doesn’t she just leave him already? Has the King of the gods not put her through enough? Last year we witnessed some unflattering mug-shots that even the beautiful goddess couldn’t make glamorous after she was arrested in connection with the recent death of one of Zeus’ mistress’ Semele. Speculation is that her hubby stepped in and pulled some strings resulting in those nasty charges being dropped.

    We all know that Zeus is a serial adulterer, he has been caught in the media with his pants down so often we have actually lost track. He may be the head of the Olympians but he needs to learn how to keep things on the down low.

    Of course this week he shocked us all with leaked pictures of him and his latest fling. And we had no idea the God swung that way! An inside source informs us that a Trojan shepherd by the name of Ganymede,  moved into the palace on Mount Olympus to take the position of cupbearer to the gods in exchange for eternal youth! The same source recons Hera doesn’t mind! Apparently it is only woman she doesn’t want her husband bedding down with. Let’s just hope this solves their marital woes, otherwise Hera could always use that magic girdle she was snapped leaving Aphrodite’s house with last week.












In this essay I will consider the features of Zeus as emphasized by mythology, and draw conclusions on the nature of the Greek gods as opposed to Christianity. 

According to Hesiod’s Works and Days, before Zeus ruled gods and mortals his father Cronus dictated a golden race. This was the first of four races created by the gods. The last three were fashioned by Zeus after he took the golden throne of Olympus from Cronus. The silver race came after the golden race and were destroyed by Zeus because they refused to pay tribute to the gods.

Animal sacrifice was hugely important to the gods. Human sacrifice however was not acceptable. It was okay for the gods to swallow each other (Zeus with his pregnant wife Metis, and Cronus who swallowed Zeus’s brothers and sisters) because they cannot die. This was not the case when Lycaon served Zeus his dismembered son. Infuriated Zeus punished Lycaon’s insolence by turning him into a wolf and striking his remaining sons down with thunderbolts.

Animal sacrifice in Christianity became outdated with the New Testament however the Christian god sacrificed his son Jesus for the sins of the people and long before the crucifixion he ordered Abraham to sacrifice his only son Isaac to show how deep his love for the god went, before stopping Abraham as he was about to obey.

The third race that came before us –the fourth and final Iron race, was the bronze race. It is here that versions of this myth change. It is said that Zeus grew tired of the Bronze species and wanted to exterminate them to make space for an improved race, but they eradicated themselves with relentless fighting before he had the chance. 

Yet in another version one that links to Christianity, is that he brought about a primeval flood to destroy the bronze people save for two, Deucalion and Pyrrha. This couple would become the race that all modern humans are descended from just like Noah and his family. Unlike with Noah, who was instructed by God himself to build an ark, Deukalion was warned by his father Prometheus to build a chest to hide his wife and himself in until the flood was over. After nine days and nine nights their chest came to rest on mount Parnassus. The first thing Deukalion did was make a sacrifice to Zeus, who showing he could be a just god granted him a favour – to repopulate the earth.

Out of all the Olympians Zeus is most like the Christian god, not in character but in power. He controls the skies, the weather and law and order just like the Christian god. He is also at times called the father, as he is the ruler of all the gods, goddesses and mortal men. But the two also have many differences. The Christian god does not ever change his form although he represents three persons - The father, the son and the Holy Spirit. Zeus could change his form and he particularly liked to use it when he was trying to seduce a woman. An example of this being when he transformed himself into a white bull and carried Europa off into the sea and to the island of Crete.

Zeus was an incredibly temperamental and egotistical god who could wipe out an entire race for not respecting the gods or if he felt they were not up to standard. The bible states that the Christian god is a perfect being with no human flaws and vices. This is definitely not the case with the twelve Olympians who have proven time and time again that they have human flaws. They fight, argue, act irrationally and are heavily prejudice thus reducing themselves to mortal level.

In most cases it is Zeus who is trying to reign the other gods and goddesses in. Such as in The Odyssey by Homer - Poseidon and Zeus argue over the fate of Odysseus. Zeus wants him to go home while Poseidon wants him killed sending storms to delay him and ultimately forcing Zeus to intervene. The Christian god has none of these flaws and is said to only act with perfect fairness and justice.

Therefore the nature of the wrathful, temperamental and egotistic Greek gods is wholly different to the one all-powerful Christian god who is said to be all forgiving, but who has no mortal flaws or vices like that of the Olympians.
(Hausmann, Raoul, The Art Critic,1919-1920,Photomontage and collage,12 3/8 x 9 7/8 in, Tate Gallery, London)
Conceptual art, internet art, happenings, video art, digital installations, nano art, bio art and interactive art all have commonalities which include the fact that they are often not considered true art movements and technology is a huge influence in their creation. I have chosen to discuss eight artworks that represent each of these art movements while providing a short interpretation of each.
To conceptual artists the idea behind the work they produce is much more important than the finished artwork. It was this view that brought about the creation of Dadaism, the concept of anything can be art including a urinal. Of course the Dadaist’s originally wanted to create a mockery of art while artists during the 1960’s only wanted to experiment with art that emphasized ideas rather than a physical product. The name of the movement was created by Sol LeWitt who wrote, “The idea itself, even if it is not made visual, is as much of a work of art as any finished product.” In his essay entitled, “Paragraphs on Conceptual Art.”[1] The work of artists like Sol LeWitt allowed photography, music and architectural drawings to become as much a part of the aesthetic as painting and sculpture.
The artist Raoul Hausmann was another artist who broke the barriers of the art world by assisting in the founding of the Dada movement in Berlin. He claims to have invented photomontage which he uses in many of his artworks such as, ‘The Art Critic’,[2] where you can see Haussmann’s cubic influence in the angular and almost geometric way he places his photomontage together. The aboutness of this artwork jumps right of the page at you. The critic, as such, seems to be wearing an outfit that is reminiscent to me of the Nazis, which is a vicious take on someone who is only doing their job, but from this one can clearly see that Haussmann disliked art critics to such a degree he would compare them to Nazi’s.
The art critic is dressed fashionably in a dull suit, his eyes and mouth have been replaced by scribbles and he is surrounded by random bits and pieces. Haussmann included a shoe on his forehead along with what appears to be a playing card below the footwear. To the right of the figure is a women and a silhouette of a man and in the critics hand is a spear. Clearly the critic takes blind stabs at the work of others when he cannot even think for himself. The shoe is a good indication of that, for it displays that he is led by others as if to critic is a game of chance and not of following one’s own opinion. I believe that this artwork is a good interpretation of the Conceptual art movement as the idea behind the actual artwork is by far more important than the photomontage.
Internet art on the other hand, is a form of digital art that is distributed via the internet and is mostly interactive. It is this interaction that attracts viewers and participants and has thus removed the traditional aesthetic experience of galleries and museums and made it available to anyone who can access the internet. An example of Internet art being the website known as, ‘We feel fine”[3], which was created in 2005 by Jonathan Harris and Sep Kamvar and went live in 2006.[4] The website searches the internet every ten minutes, displaying its findings from say, blogs and social networking sites, in an appealing visual representation. These expressions of human emotion are only able to be represented because of the use of data visualization. The aboutness of this artwork is that it records sentences from around the world on how people are feeling, thus creating a database of over several million feelings throughout the entire world. The viewer can even search feelings to find out answers to various questions such as, which country is sad more than happy and how the weather effects certain emotions.
We feel fine is built on an interface that uses a self-organizing particle system. Each particle being one person’s emotion. As one can imagine there are thousands of particles that move around the screen that you can interact with by clicking on it. The colour, shape and size tells a story about the emotion and the person and represents the nature of the feeling. Once clicked the particle reveals either a photo or the full sentence of the feeling.[5] We feel fine is an artwork created by the entire world. It allows us to connect with others and adds a bit of understanding to our everyday lives. The website is a good example of internet art because of this interaction and internet use.
My next art movement’s name was coined by Allan Kaprow. He was passionate about exposing the performative capabilities of art and so in 1959 he presented the art piece entitled, “18 Happenings in 6 Parts,”[6] at the Ruben gallery in New York, and he chose the word, ‘happening’ to suggest, ‘something spontaneous, something that just happens to happen’,[7] and so the term was created. Happenings today can refer to any kind of performance art from the latest trend of Flashmobs to performance type pieces at galleries. They can occur anywhere and rely on the active participation of the audience.
For instance, Kaprow’s piece, “18 Happenings in 6 parts,” consisted of a space divided into three rooms with clear plastic walls[8]. The viewers played a role in the artwork as they had tickets that directed them to specific seats in each room. They could only enter to take their seats at specific times and once seated they witnessed events such as a girl squeezing oranges, an artist lighting matches and painting and an orchestra of toy instruments. It was very well thought out with a script that might have been stricter than any theatre at the time and yet it was effortless and created an atmosphere of spontaneity more than anything else. This of course was due to the fact that it was a performance that had none of the rules and regulations of theatre work and because of its influence of a seemingly unstructured performance it is a good example of what the happenings art movement is.
Which brings me to the video art movement which relied on TV and Radio as its fundamental means. The uses of which can take many forms, such as, recordings that are broadcasted or viewed in galleries or distributed on tapes and discs. However, the movement is not limited to recordings, it can include sculptural installations that incorporate one or more TV receivers or monitors that display live or recorded images. Nam June Paik was the first to experiment with broadcast pictures and distorted magnets in 1959.[9] What followed was his acquirement of recording equipment which lead to his production of tapes, performances and multi monitor installations one of which being, “Highway.”
Paik might have been seen as one of the most important people in regards to the start of video art but Bill Viola mastered the movement with the advances in video production and his creation of the installation known as, “Stations”.[10] Stations was created in 1994 and is a five-channel colour and sound video. Five projection screens rest on five granite slabs and each projection displays a nude figure suspended in water. The five figures who appear to float like ethereal beings are accompanied by a placid soundtrack of bubbling sounds and underwater murmurs. It gives the impression that one is being transported underwater to watch the five sleeping forms. The figures float upside down and appear to drift out of their frames very slowly. The granite slabs which are polished as to give a reflection allow the artwork the appearance of the figures swimming in pools of black liquid. [11]
To me this piece gives the impression of a circular existence. There is no beginning and no end. It as if the figures are suspended in time, in a constant meditation, pondering the meanings of life, death and rebirth and perhaps in a sense they reflect on birth like a child suspended in animation waiting for its life to begin. It begs one to ask the old age question of what happens once we die and “Stations”, answers by hinting that we might return to our beginning forms suspended in time. Thus, this is a philosophical piece, full of divine questions that allows the viewer the freedom to ponder the meaning of life. It is Violas mix of philosophy, sound and video that makes this art piece a good example of video art.
Digital art is any art that can be made with the help of a computer. Majority of the time this means that hand drawings are scanned and changed via various digital programs and it applies to photographs as well as 3D created images. Boris Vallejo and his model wife, Julie Bell, have been in the digital art industry since 1964.[12]
He is mostly exclusive to fantasy and erotic art but he has done some amazing work on marvel characters too. His wife is usually the model for any womanly figures and his male characters are modelled by himself. One of his most famous artworks is the superhero Storm form The X Men. From this artwork one can immediately see his mastery of oil painting which is what he uses to paint his sketches before digitally altering them. He style is so classic it pays homage to the old masters of France and Italy. There is a combination of strength and sensuality in this piece that makes it above average. The human form holds incredible power and motion which one can definitely see when studying Storm’s ligaments and muscles. [13] For this reason Storm is a perfect example of how one can be an excellent artist while allowing digital media to improve on the original creation.
Nano art is one the latest art movements to come into existence and one, along with Bio art which I find incredibly interesting. This art discipline includes art, science and technology to create mind blowing works that would make our ancestors think we had evolved into gods. And perhaps with technology and Nano engineering that is what artists like Cris Orfescu are hoping to be by manipulating cells into the form of pictures. Nano art features nano landscapes which are the natural structures of molecular and atomic scales.[14]
Nano sculptures on the other hand are matter that has been manipulated with chemical and physical processes to create a new form. Cris Orfescu wanted to promote nano art as a worldwide reflection of the technological movement and so he founded it. He believed that nano art could effectively interest the public while introducing them to new technologies at the same time. He wanted to show the public how nano engineering could impact our lives.[15] One of his artworks known as, “The Hole” was created in 1994 and can now be bought as a picture or 19x13 inch print. Like Pop Art this technique can be sold at large to the public. It is a photograph of vitreous reticulated carbon foam ligaments and micropore[16] which to my mind looks quite similar to a colonoscopy scan with an added invert filter, however it is not and it is clearly very interesting which makes it a good example to use when discussing nano art.
Like nano art, Bio art is an art movement that uses science in order to create pieces. It is a movement which uses biotechnology such as genetic engineering, tissue culture and cloning to manipulate live tissues, bacteria and living organisms. One would assume that work like this would be limited to a laboratory when in actual fact it can be done in galleries as well as artists’ studios too. Eduardo Kac coined the phrase in 1997 when he created the work entitled, “time capsule”, although the actual movement originated at the end of the 20th century through Joe Davis.  Most often Bio Art is intended to be shocking or humorous and while the authors of the artworks can be seen as artists they are most often classified as scientists because of the skill set required for such a work[17]. 
In 2000 Eduardo Kac commissioned the creation of a transgenic GFP bunny as part of a piece called GFP Bunny. The bunny was called Alba and she had been genetically engineered to appear fluorescent. She was the beginning and influence of a piece called, “The Eight Day”, which one can already assume by the name, is a take on God’s creation of the world in seven days. In this regard Kac is referring to himself as god and on the 8th day he created fluorescent animals and changed a living organism biochemistry or makeup. The Eight day investigates his creation of fluorescent creatures that have been created in the isolation of laboratories. His point is that when one puts them together they can be seen as the nucleus of a new and emerging synthetic bioluminescent system. The piece that was presented at a gallery in Arizona brought together all the living transgenic life forms and a biological robot in an environment enclosed under a clear 4 foot diameter Plexiglas dome.[18]
It allowed the viewer to study how these creatures would naturally coexist with one another if they were freed into the world. It was a self-contained artificial ecological system. The creatures were all cloned using the GFP gene which made them appear green to the naked eye[19]. The creatures included mice, plants, amoebae and fish which of course gained the attention of people who believe it be unethical especially to animal rights activists. Despite this the eight day and Alba are fantastic creations that display how we as humans have evolved and because of this and the use of bioengineering it is an excellent example of bio art.
My final art movement is called Interactive art where these installations allow the viewer to interact with the actual art work, whether it is just by walking in, on or around the piece or if they actually become a part of what makes it interactive art. This is a large development in the art world as previously viewers of art could not and still cannot touch, photograph or get too close to important artworks while interactive art encourages the viewer to interact and to become a part of the artistic process. Frequent features include computers and motion, heat sensors. A leading figure in such a movement is Jeffery Shaw and his work entitled, “The legible city”[20].
The piece in question consists of an immovable bicycle, a touch pad and a large screen in front of the bike. The purpose is for the viewer to seat themselves on the bike and ‘move’ through the streets projected in front of them.  However, the streets are anything but ordinary. Unlike realistic streets that are often lined with trees these are lined with letters so that the cyclist can choose their own narrative and learn the history of the city by reading the sides of the street as they venture through it. A small screen attached to the handle bars allows the viewer to plot their position which included three versions: Manhattan, Amsterdam and Karlsruhe[21]. Considering that this artwork is believed to be one of the first of its kind as well as interactive art it is a good representation of the movement.
Therefore, I have interpreted each movement by using an example of an artwork to clarify how they differ and how they are similar in the fact that they needed technology to begin and grow.